越想越觉得这个事情很可爱。然后特地跑去gg出了一大堆东西:
Notes: According to WOTC, due to the wording of the feat, entering the square includes shifting. However, it still does not include forced movement such as a push, pull or slide. It must be "active" movement.
No word on whether teleporting into the square triggers the feat.
Also, as a reminder (to address a commonly asked question with this feat), you cannot take opportunity attacks during your turn, even if an enemy moves during your turn.
引自
http://dnd4.wikia.com/wiki/Polearm_Gamble (然后我个人就觉得卫生纸的回答明显nc了)
虽然听起来这个回答初看是有点道理的(phb里面受迫移动不引起ao是写得明明白白的,然而shift只说了离开相邻格的时候不引发,没说进入),然而,显然会造成各种奇怪的现象。
随后看网上的讨论,果然,除了传送,其他人提出了各种奇怪的情况:
1。最开始就是有人争辩“特殊大于一般”,于是受迫不引ao能不能算?类似的还有当你被震撼/控制/突袭的时候——如果只钻字眼,长柄赌博可没说你自己是啥情况。
2。同样,类似的还有传送、未被侦测到的隐身敌人接近,等等。
3。虽然我没看到其他人提出,但是自己最近在翻译和尚。和尚有大把套路的移动,都说明了“不引发借机攻击”。于是特例撞特例,打架么?
看到的一个简洁明了的合理解释方式是这样的(不过强调一次,这是在其他bbs上找的,不是卫生纸的站):
To clean this up, Polearm Gamble should read:
When someone moves into a square adjacent to you, you may make an opportunity attack against them, just like you normally can when they leave a square adjacent to you. If you take this opportunity attack, you grant the target combat advantage until...
---
All of a sudden, Polearm Gamble is quite clear. While it doesn't read like the above, I'd presume it was meant to read like the above, and you'd end up with a sensible feat that is still worth taking.
如果有不懂鸟语的兄弟,上面的解释是:
“长武器赌博:当一个本不与你相邻的敌人进入与你相邻的方格,你可以用长武器对其进行借机攻击,犹如正常情形下他从你的相邻方格离开时一样。但直到该敌人的下一回合结束,他获得对你的战斗优势。”于是世界瞬间清净了……